Kansas Athletic Commission Reveals MMA Open Scoring Data

The Kansas Athletic Commission, under the umbrella of the Kansas Department of Commerce, has been one of the more progressive and involved regulators when it comes to making novel changes in combat sports.

One of the novel steps the Commission has taken was introducing open scoring to Mixed Martial Arts. Open scoring simply reveals the score to the fighters and the audience after each round. Instread of being kept a secret to the end each fighter knows exactly where they stand on the scorecards should the bout go the distance. A critisism some raise of open scoring is it could lead to boring fights with the scorecard leader simply looking to play it safe in the final rounds knowing they are up on points.

Today, the Kansas Athletic Commission released their data to date revealing this concern is not borne out by the evidence. Instead the evidence shows the winning fighter often goes on to finish the bout despite knowledge that they are up on the judges scorecards. This data refuting the concerns of some may go a long way in having other regulators consider also adopting open scoring.

Post Real-Time Scoring (9 LFA and 5 Invicta)

Finishes: 48 Fighter Ahead: 14 – 29% Fighter Behind: 6 – 12.5% Tied: 2 – 4.2%

First Round: 26 – 54.2%

22 Finishes not first round:

Second round – 14 total – 29.2% Ahead – 9 Behind – 5

Third round (all final round) – seven total – 14.5% Ahead – 5 Behind – 0 Tied – 2

Fourth round – one total – 2% – Invicta Title fight Ahead – 0 Behind – 1 Tied – 0 Fifth round – 0

This can be contrasted with the 10 shows pre real time scoring in Kansas which had the following data

Pre Real-Time Scoring: Invicta (8), LFA (1), UFC (1)

Finishes: 30 Fighter Ahead: 9 – 30% Fighter Behind: 2 – 6.7% Tied: 0 First Round: 19 – 63.3% 22

Finishes not first round:

Second round – 7 total – 23.3% Ahead – 5 Behind – 2

Third round (all final round) – 4 total – 13% Ahead – 4 Behind – 0 Tied – 0

The following spread sheets were released with the full data contrasting the pre and post open scoring results:

Executive Director Adam Roorbach summarized the data via email as follows:

Having just finished our LFA residency, just wanted to send an update on our tracking of Real Time Scoring (RTS).  I am attaching the spreadsheet with the numbers listed below, and that is a combination of tweets that were sent out.  If you have any questions send me and email!   

Fighter up 2 points on 2 cards winning the final round on at least 2 cards – Pre RTS using Invicta (49 fights), LFC (10) and UFC (13), 65.4% (17/26) of fighters won final round.  Using RTS with LFA (69 fights) and Invicta (23), fighters won the final round at a 72.4% (21/19) clip. Looking at finish percentage, Invicta (37%pre and 35%post) and LFA’s (60% pre and 58% post) stayed relatively the same. In the 48 total finishes, 54% happened in the first round using RTS, with 63% of 30 finishes happing in the first before RTS . The fighter finishing was ahead in the fight 81% of the time before RTS (9/11), but only 63.7% (14/22) after RTS (2 tied – 9.1%). Finishes in just the second round saw the fighter ahead win 71.4% (5/7) of the time before RTS, but that fell to 60% (9/15) using RTS. Third round finishes saw 100% of those ahead pre RTS finishing winning, while 71.4% (5/7) won after RTS with two fights being tied.


2 thoughts on “Kansas Athletic Commission Reveals MMA Open Scoring Data

  1. My main concerns about drawing conclusions from the results are the very limited sample size for the non-Invicta fights Pre-RTS; the relatively smaller sample size for the Invicta fights Post-RTS compared to Invicta Pre-RTS;  and the inclusion of UFC results in Pre-RTS when there are no UFC results included Post-RTS (I assume that’s because UFC had no Kansas cards after RTS was adopted.)
    Only 10 LFA fights Pre-RTS vs. 69 Post-RTS: Not really useful for identifying trends, but generally supportive of a conclusion that results pre- and post-RTS were consistent with each other.

    Slightly off-topic: Are all promoters holding shows in Kansas required to have RTS at their events? I thought I read somewhere or heard on a broadcast that it was optional?

    Interesting information, overall. As a fan I enjoy having RTS. I assume without knowing that a lot of fighters and their corners appreciate it as well.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s