How Many UFC Fighters Are Not Subject To Their Anti-Doping Program?

Posted: August 10, 2015 in Uncategorized

When the UFC announced their aggressive anti doping program (and to their credit the most robust in professional sports) they basically acknowledged they are unilaterally moving forward with the program and will cross legal barriers as they arise.

The biggest legal barrier?  Athlete consent.  It seems some athletes simply are not contractually bound by this program which can have far reaching implications on an athletes career, even those simply guilty by association.

Last week MMA personality FrontRowBrian sent a tweet with following image of a contract addendum suggesting that the UFC was asking their roster to sign –

FRB tweet image of Zuffa Contract Addendum re PED testing policy

If true, this is in essence an admission by the UFC that fighters under old contracts (from the date one can assume this would cover at least all contracts that pre date December 2013) are not bound by the current anti-doping policy.

Where things get interesting is what happens to a fighter that refuses to sign this addendum?  Any first year law student can tell you that a contract cannot be changed without consent of both parties.  If a fighter chooses not to sign this addendum and not be bound by the UFC’s heavy hitting ADP policy they would be within their rights not to so so.

The question remains, exactly how many fighters have not agreed to this program and how is the UFC dealing with them?

Advertisements
Comments
  1. […] month I questioned whether all UFC fighters have agreed to the promoter’s anti-doping policy and ponde….  Yesterday, the UFC’s Vice President of Athlete Health & Performance, Jeff Novitzky, […]

  2. […] has been tested by USADA 4 times meaning that he likely has signed the UFC/USADA contract addendum which was one of the potential barriers for an athlete who took a hiatus from competition before […]

  3. […] As previously discussed, this is in essence an admission by the UFC that fighters under old contracts (from the date one can assume this would cover at least all contracts that pre date December 2013) are not bound by the current anti-doping policy.  UFC’s current contract pre-dates this time frame. […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s